Chinese embassy in London: residents vow appeal after loss
A British court dismissed a challenge to planning permission for a large Chinese embassy in central London on Friday, but residents seeking to block the project said they would try to appeal.
A campaign group of local residents and businesses had challenged permission for the planned embassy next to the Tower of London. They argued that the project would increase the risk of a terror attack, espionage and harassment of dissidents and protesters.
Two judges ruled remotely that the claims were dismissed, saying the housing minister and the London district of Tower Hamlets had acted lawfully when planning permission was granted in January.
The Royal Mint Court Residents Association said it would apply for permission to appeal and hoped the case would reach the UK Supreme Court. It said it had relaunched crowdfunding efforts to pay legal costs.
Beijing bought the former Royal Mint site in 2018 and plans to move its embassy there. The site covers 20,000 square metres, and UK planning documents put the projected floor space at more than 50,000 square metres, which would make it London’s largest embassy by floor space.
The project has faced opposition from nearby residents, rights groups and critics of China’s ruling Communist Party. The Daily Telegraph reported that unredacted plans showed Beijing planned a “concealed chamber” among “secret rooms” under the embassy, close to sensitive underground communications cables.
Then-security minister Dan Jarvis told MPs that “any risks are being appropriately managed”. He said intelligence agency chiefs had helped develop measures to manage risks and that consolidating China’s seven current London sites into one would bring security advantages.
Update
The Royal Mint Court Residents Association said it would apply for permission to appeal and hoped the case would reach the UK Supreme Court.
The residents’ association said it had relaunched crowdfunding for legal costs.
The Daily Telegraph reported that unredacted plans showed a concealed chamber among secret rooms under the planned embassy.
Then-security minister Dan Jarvis told MPs that any risks were being appropriately managed.
Source note: AFP news report published on 31 July 2026 at 11:49:14 UTC.
Update
The High Court challenge was brought by local residents and businesses.
The challengers argued the planned embassy near the Tower of London would be used to spy on and harass dissidents and rights activists.
Two judges dismissed the claims after a hearing this month.
The ruling upheld the government's January decision to grant planning permission.
Source note: AFP news report published on 31 July 2026 at 11:04:14 UTC.
Uncertainty notes
The outcome of any application for permission to appeal is unresolved.
The concealed-chamber claim is attributed to the Daily Telegraph’s reporting on unredacted plans.
Source
AFP news report published on .