PFAS pesticides: Trump EPA approvals raise concern
President Donald Trump's administration has approved five new pesticides that many scientists and environmental advocates say are PFAS “forever chemicals,” intensifying a dispute over how the United States defines and regulates the substances.
The Environmental Protection Agency uses a narrower definition of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances that excludes the pesticides. The agency says the products pose no threat to human health and argues that pesticides are important for food supplies, are reviewed before approval and that single-fluorinated chemicals can be less toxic than alternatives.
Many scientists and advocates use a broader definition adopted by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development in 2021, covering any molecule with a single fully fluorinated carbon atom. Roughly half of US states, Congress and the Pentagon have upheld that definition, as did 150 scientists in a 2024 consensus statement.
Critics say the pesticide approvals may carry hidden risks, including because many such pesticides break down into trifluoroacetic acid, or TFA, which is now found extensively in water. The EU's food safety agency last week cut its acceptable daily intake for TFA.
Trifludimoxazin, one of the newly approved herbicides, has “suggestive evidence of carcinogenic potential,” according to the EPA's own review.
Nathan Donley of the Center for Biological Diversity, who led a 2024 analysis of past pesticide ingredients, told AFP that the issue had been “conveniently swept under the rug” by multiple administrations and was “definitely getting worse.” Environmental Working Group scientist Varun Subramaniam told AFP that an analysis of produce samples found PFAS pesticide residues were common on US peaches and plums.
Criticism has also focused on former lobbyists in senior EPA posts. A Freedom of Information Act request led by Donley found that EPA officials, including agency chief Lee Zeldin, coordinated edits last November to the agency's webpage on PFAS and pesticides, removing acknowledgement of the more widely accepted definition. Neither the EPA nor CropLife America responded to AFP about whether they coordinated over the changes.
Uncertainty notes
Whether the pesticides should be classified as PFAS depends on the definition used.
The health risks of the newly approved pesticides are disputed between the EPA and critics.
Neither the EPA nor CropLife America responded to AFP on whether they coordinated over webpage changes.
Source
AFP news report published on .