Law & Justice
Trump tariffs face lawsuit from 25 US states
Twenty-five US states sued the Trump administration on Monday over tariffs of 10 to 12.5 percent on 60 trading partners, arguing that President Donald Trump exceeded his authority.
The states filed the case at the US Court of International Trade in New York. They asked judges to halt implementation of the tariffs, declare them unlawful and order the government to issue refunds.
The coalition argued in a court filing that there was “no rational fit” between the stated concern about forced labor in international supply chains and what it described as blanket global tariffs imposed by the US Trade Representative's office.
The tariffs were imposed after USTR probes into forced-labor allegations under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. The states called the probes “a pretextual and unlawful effort to exert unfettered tariff power” and said the tariff action was “arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law.”
White House spokesman Kush Desai defended the tariffs, saying the United States was using lawful authority to address policies and practices that burden US commerce. He said Section 301 tariffs had proved legally durable since Trump's first term.
The Section 301 tariffs took effect on July 24, replacing a previous 10-percent global levy. Trump's first round of tariffs, imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, was struck down by the US Supreme Court in February.
Of the 25 states in the lawsuit, 23 have Democratic governors. Nevada and Vermont are led by Republicans.
Trump has argued that US trading partners have taken advantage of the United States and has used tariffs as leverage in trade negotiations. His separate sector-specific tariffs on steel, automobiles and other goods were imposed under different legal authorities and have not been affected by recent legal challenges.
Update
The states asked the US Court of International Trade to halt the tariffs, declare them unlawful and order refunds.
The White House said the tariffs were legal and defended the use of Section 301 authority.
The states argued the Section 301 probes were rushed, prejudged and pretextual.
The source added that Trump's separate sector-specific tariffs on steel, automobiles and other goods have not been affected by recent legal challenges.
Source note: AFP news report published on 3 August 2026 at 21:22:51 UTC.
Update
The challenged tariffs are between 10 and 12.5 percent.
The tariffs were imposed on 60 trading partners after US Trade Representative probes into forced-labor allegations under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.
The new tariffs took effect on July 24, replacing a 10-percent global levy that expired in July.
The complaint says the Section 301 probes were pretextual, rushed and prejudged.
Twenty-three of the 25 states have Democratic governors; Nevada and Vermont have Republican governors.
Source note: AFP news report published on 3 August 2026 at 20:51:40 UTC.
Update
The states argued that President Donald Trump exceeded his authority by imposing new levies on 60 countries.
The lawsuit concerns wide-ranging tariffs.
The states argued in a court filing that there was no rational fit between forced labor in supply chains and the blanket global tariffs imposed by the US Trade Representative's office.
Source note: AFP news report published on 3 August 2026 at 20:18:38 UTC.
Uncertainty notes
The outcome of the lawsuit is unresolved.
Source
AFP news report published on .