Plain News by AI Source-based international news without the spin.

Health & Public Health

US panel backs more peptides for compounding despite safety concerns

A United States review panel recommended loosening restrictions on all but one of seven peptides considered during a two-day meeting, despite objections from medical experts who said the substances are not well studied enough for broad access.

The advisory committee, assembled to advise the US Food and Drug Administration, considered whether to add the peptides to the US compounding list. The list allows compounding facilities to use certain ingredients when preparing custom medicines for patients with specific prescriptions.

On Friday, the panel backed semax and epitalon. Wellness clinics promote semax for conditions including depression and anxiety. Epitalon is promoted as a substance that can prevent aging and help with insomnia.

The panel narrowly voted against adding emideltide. The substance had been considered for insomnia, narcolepsy and opioid withdrawal, and has been marketed with other claims including stress, pain and cancer. David Pope, chief pharmacy officer for the medical technology company Xifin Pharmacy Solutions, cast a deciding no vote after backing all the previous peptides, citing potentially dangerous downstream consequences.

Those decisions followed Thursday recommendations to add BPC-157, KPV, TB-500 and MOT-c to the list. Physicians and public health advocates warned that the safety and effectiveness of the substances are far from proven.

The recommendations are not binding, but the FDA has historically given such panel advice significant weight. The positive votes also went against agency career scientists who had urged continued restrictions because of limited data and safety concerns.

FDA staffer Russell Wesdyk said in opening remarks Friday that many public commentators and committee members had noted significant quality problems with the substances, as well as issues with common names that could make it harder to identify what they contain. He said he appreciated calls for quality guardrails, but warned that the bulks list does not give the agency the regulatory authority to put those guardrails in place.

Peptides are short chains of amino acids, the building blocks of proteins. They occur naturally in the body, but synthetic peptides have become increasingly popular in the wellness industry. Supporters make broad claims about benefits including skin appearance, muscle growth, brain health and wound healing. The report said there is scant to no clinical evidence supporting such promises, and doctors have warned that endorsing poorly understood substances could steer patients away from evidence-backed treatments.

Medical experts accused President Donald Trump's health chief Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of filling the FDA advisory committee with people who have strong ties to the peptide industry, given his personal interest in and use of the products.

The peptides under review were among substances restricted from compounding during former president Joe Biden's administration, notably because of a lack of human clinical trial data. The report said the substances remain available online from chemical suppliers for lab use.

Update

The panel recommended adding semax and epitalon to the US compounding list.

The panel narrowly voted to exclude emideltide.

David Pope of Xifin Pharmacy Solutions cast a deciding no vote on emideltide and cited potentially dangerous downstream consequences.

FDA staffer Russell Wesdyk said many commentators and committee members had noted quality problems with the substances and issues with their common names.

The report adds that the panel's recommendations are not binding but historically carry significant weight with the FDA.

Source note: AFP news report published on 24 July 2026 at 21:50:30 UTC.

Update

The panel recommended allowing specialized pharmacies to produce four peptides: BPC-157, KPV, TB-500 and MOT-c.

The panel is due to consider three more substances on Friday.

The recommendations are not binding, though the Food and Drug Administration has historically given them significant weight.

FDA career scientists had urged maintaining restrictions because of limited data and safety concerns.

Panel members Elizabeth Rebello and Brian Lee voted against BPC-157 and cited lack of efficacy data, safety concerns and possible harm.

Peter Lurie of the Center for Science in the Public Interest urged against easing restrictions and criticized the committee process.

A Hims & Hers representative said the company would benefit commercially if allowed to offer peptides such as BPC-157, while saying the evidence for BPC-157 was not strong.

Source note: AFP news report published on 24 July 2026 at 02:02:59 UTC.

Update

The panel had recommended adding both BPC-157 and KPV to the approved compounding list as of Thursday afternoon.

The votes to recommend BPC-157 and KPV were 8-6 with one abstention.

Panel member Elizabeth Rebello said she voted no on BPC-157 because of lack of efficacy data and safety concerns.

Panel member Brian Lee said he thought endorsing BPC-157 could be potentially harmful.

Peter Lurie of the Center for Science in the Public Interest said the votes showed weak evidence being accepted by a panel he said had been stacked.

Hims chief medical officer Anant Vinjamoori said evidence for BPC-157 is not strong and said his company would benefit commercially if it could offer such peptides.

Source note: AFP news report published on 23 July 2026 at 21:01:09 UTC.

Update

A US review panel voted 8-6, with one abstention, to recommend adding BPC-157 to the FDA bulks list for compounding.

The recommendation would allow specialized pharmacies to produce BPC-157 if accepted by the FDA.

FDA scientists urged against greater access to BPC-157 during presentations to the panel.

Two panel members who voted no cited lack of efficacy data, safety concerns and potential harm.

The committee is due to consider six more peptides during its two-day meeting.

Source note: AFP news report published on 23 July 2026 at 18:16:37 UTC.

Uncertainty notes

The source reports that the safety and efficacy of the peptides are far from proven.
The panel's recommendations are advisory and not binding on the FDA.
The source reports scant to no clinical evidence for many wellness claims made about the substances.

Source

AFP news report published on .

Contact / Feedback

Send feedback, corrections or questions.